aecdata — An Open Source Python Library to do more with Construction Data
There’s so much data. There’s so much technology. Can’t we use data to reach out climate targets?
The sad reality of the status-quo
The construction industry is not the most data-mature industry. There’s multiple reasons for that:
- Concerns around data sharing
- Analogue processes (more here)
- Informal decision making
- Long timelines of projects
- Start-from-scratch mentality (…and a solution here)
- Lack of interoperability (although Speckle is making leaps there)
- Lack of structured data (2050 Materials is fixing this)
The real reason this is a problem
At the same time, the AEC industry is under the magnifying glass due to it’s inordinate impact on global emissions, and overall impact on climate change. Designers, engineers, consultants and contractors have to suddenly answer their client how they’re reducing the impact of their new project.
And everyone (almost) is trying.
Crunch crunch
Currently, a big focus (justifiably) is on carbon data. There’s 2 types of carbon data:
- Energy-related carbon — how much energy is used to keep the building warm/cool and how much CO2 is emitted to create that energy
- Material-related carbon — how much CO2 is in each brick/plasterboard/window/door/chair which goes in the building?
The energy related carbon has been around for a while. There’s countless solutions to model and optimise the building’s energy performance (see Cove.Tool).
Click click click click
However, when it comes to material-related carbon, 99.99% of the industry uses sub-par software to manually input their BoM (bill-of-material) and calculate a carbon footprint of their building.
The problem with this approach (as we’ve written about before here and here and here and here) is that a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is usually generated after the biggest decisions have already been made around the structural materials, shape, height and basic architectural materials (e.g. the envelop), which by definition makes them a retrospective analysis, and not an exercise meant to drive design decisions.
A call for change in the AEC industry
There is a future out there however, where material and product data is used for analysis, insights, optimisation, decision making and more.
In fact, we’re building that future at 2050 Materials.
That’s all we’re saying for now.
Stay tuned, or pip install aecdata
Related articles
Reading Between the EPD Lines
Two EPDs can report almost the same A1 to A3 carbon figure and still deserve very different levels of trust. Here is how to read the fine print.
Read more
Data Centers’ Hidden 137M-Tonne Carbon Bill
New data centers could lock in ~137M tonnes of CO2e before a single server switches on. GGBS concrete and recycled steel could cut about 31M of it.
Read more
Built to Beat the Heat
This summer's drought wasn't a fluke, it was a preview. Here's the material data that actually decides whether a building shrugs off a heatwave or quietly cooks behind a great winter U value: decrement delay, solar reflectance, SHGC, and the real products behind each one.
Read more